1205 Franklin Avenue
Suite 110
Garden City, NY 11530
212-319-1000
Click on this link to view the article in pdf format
On appeal from a $2.8 million judgment the Appellate Division held that an industrial equipment manufacturer’s successor, which had a contract to maintain the equipment its predecessor sold, cannot be held liable because the end user’s modification of the equipment, rather than the manufacturer’s design, rendered the equipment unreasonably unsafe and the defendant had no notice that the end user made an unsafe modification to the equipment.
Attorneys |
|---|
| Timothy J. Keane |